My speech had more strength with non-verbal part than the verbal part. I had strong and straightforward evidence and reasons that emphasized my thesis about the after school policy. During the speech, I was successful with keeping a flow within my sentences. Also, my voice was loud and engaging, which allowed audience to pay attention to my speech. However, there were several parts that I could improve on next time. First of all, I need to keep a constant eye contact with the audience instead of looking at the paper. Also, I need to have a difference in tone between emotional and logical aspects of the speech. Lastly, I need to have more consistency with my reading of speech. Other than these factors, I believe my speech was done quite well and I was successful with accomplishing my point through the speech.
Peer Evaluation
Kevin LeeJason Park
HaJung Kim
Corie Hahn
Lydia Ahn
Phillip Song
Mady Flores
Jenny Lee
Sam Lee
Edward Cho
Leah Park
jenice
Self Evaluation
My speech had more strength with non-verbal part than the verbal part. I had strong and straightforward evidence and reasons that emphasized my thesis about the after school policy. During the speech, I was successful with keeping a flow within my sentences. Also, my voice was loud and engaging, which allowed audience to pay attention to my speech. However, there were several parts that I could improve on next time. First of all, I need to keep a constant eye contact with the audience instead of looking at the paper. Also, I need to have a difference in tone between emotional and logical aspects of the speech. Lastly, I need to have more consistency with my reading of speech. Other than these factors, I believe my speech was done quite well and I was successful with accomplishing my point through the speech.